News & Commentary

The Shattered Glass Ceiling: Women Voters after Hillary Clinton's Run

Originally published on Townhall.com

The Democratic National Convention is upon us, and much of the press commentary revolves around "her." Hillary Clinton, that is, and whether she and her supporters will unite behind Barack Obama. Both campaigns are now developing strategies to attract the votes of women. The best way to do this is not to play gender politics, but to craft sensible solutions to the problems that affect women, men, families, and children.

The Democratic race was unusually hard-fought, and the antagonism of women of a certain era to Senator Obama remains strong. Disgruntled Clinton supporters have created a "Just Say No Deal" coalition including 250 internet groups to oppose his nomination. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll finds that 21 percent of Democrats plan to vote for Senator McCain. That is likely to change by November 4th, but even a small number of Democratic defectors could cost Senator Obama victory in a tight race.

Senator Clinton's supporters are rightly proud of her candidacy. Set aside the controversies of her husband's presidency, she has become one of her party's most important figures. In the presidential race she vanquished several distinguished opponents, including Senator Joe Biden, who is now Senator Obama's running mate. And Clinton lost the nomination by the narrowest of margins.

Rather than blame Senator Obama, the media, or misogynists for her loss, Clinton supporters should celebrate her accomplishments. The glass ceiling doesn't just have 18 million cracks, as she has said. It has been shattered. The next woman to run for president, in either party, will be doing nothing out of the ordinary.

How then should Senators Obama and McCain appeal to former Clinton supporters and women voters in general? The answer is not, and never was, to put a woman on the ticket. The candidates need to talk to women about issues. And not just "women's issues"-whatever that means. As we say at the Independent Women's Forum, all issues are women's issues. Women are affected by questions of war and peace, economic turmoil, education, and more. Indeed, that's why Senator Obama carried a majority of the votes of Democratic women in more than a dozen states. Most women want the best candidate, not the best female candidate.

When the fall campaign begins in earnest in September, both candidates need to explain what they will do to encourage economic growth, reduce consumer uncertainty, and revive confidence in the financial system. Should government get out of the way or play a bigger role? What financial institutions, if any, should be bailed out by government? What, if anything, should be done about the housing market?

Thankfully energy prices have begun to dip. But the burden on families, especially those of modest means, remains enormous. How do we increase the supply of energy? And how do we do that while protecting the environment?

What of America's defense? We still have troops in Iraq, the fighting in Afghanistan is getting worse, al-Qaeda has been weakened but not destroyed, and the Russian bear has woken. These issues matter for women as citizens as well as for women as mothers, daughters, and wives. What kind of judgment and experience would the candidates bring to the presidency?

Education is another critical issue. Our children are not being prepared morally to preserve our democratic republic. Nor are they learning the skills necessary to compete in a global economy. How do we fix schools which are failing our children-and, equally important, transform schools to meet the changing needs of the future?

There is so much more. We are the wealthiest nation in the world, but there are still poor among us. How do we help them become self-supporting and full participants in our abundant civic life? Our health care system provides extraordinary medical treatment to many but leaves others behind. And on it goes.

There is no women's position on any of these issues. My bias is towards the private sector and away from heavy-handed government programs. Other women will disagree with me. But all of us want to hear the candidates talk about the important issues.

I disagree with Senator Clinton on many issues, but nevertheless admire her intelligence and her tenacious fight for the Democratic presidential nomination. The best way to honor her, however, is not for the candidates to make special appeals to women. Instead, they should appeal to the American people, more than half of whom happen to be women.

5 Comments

Janna | August 30, 2008, 12:29am | #

If we were to specify a "women's issue", the freedom to get an abortion lays with Obama, not McCain. Whether or not you agree with abortion, I'm not about to have a man dictate my rights about something he will never have to face. Obama also stresses the importance of truly equal pay for both women and men for the same jobs. If not for anything else, Obama has my vote for protecting the rights of women. When will these Republicans learn that taking away freedoms to fix a problem actually causes more problems?

Caryn | September 2, 2008, 3:42pm | #

Janna, as I consider myself to be a "true Republican" with the ideals of a democratic republic, freedom and smaller, not bigger government, I couldn't agree with you more. After centuries of religous persecution, especially in England and Europe, our government foundations were created on the basis of government staying out of our religion. Today's so-called Republican party would like religion to infringe upon our government. I see this as being closer to those imperical governments of the past or communist China's policy of limiting the number of children in a family. The so-called "base" of the Republican would like to enforce a policy of government to dictate the number of children within a family. This sounds like communism to me.

Don | September 2, 2008, 4:24pm | #

Abortion? The reality is that neither McCain nor Obama will do anything significant about abortion. Obama will appoint judges that will continue in the mold of those who authored the majority opinion in Kelo, i.e., that it is fine for the government to take land away to hand over to a mini mall developer.

Obama's far left ideas, his lack of accomplishments, his lack of executive experience should give everyone pause.

Janice | September 2, 2008, 6:55pm | #

Michelle Bernard is an absolutely nitwit. Michelle said that right-wing mothers believe that mothers should work and left-wing mothers believe that mothers should stay at home with their children. She referred to Sarah Palin, stating that left-wing mothers are angry because she is not staying home with her exceptional child. Nothing is farther from the truth in ideology. Left-wing mothers, low to middle income families, have HAD to work to make “means meet.” We understand working mothers! Right wing mothers’ spouses typically make money than left-wing mothers and their spouses together. Therefore, right-wing mothers do not have to work.



In reference to Michelle Bernard saying that, Barack Obama uses words that people can’t understand and especially in his acceptance, speech on August 28 is very asinine I am 50 years old; I understood the speech. My father, who is not a college graduate, understood it. My grandmother, who only completed the 8th grade, understood it!


Michelle, the main reason women are not flocking to McCain is because he has insulted our intelligence. McCain thinks any woman will do. He thinks we are too naïve and stupid to know the difference between Palin and Hillary. My respect for you has dwindled to the bottom of the pit.

Roslyn | September 2, 2008, 8:39pm | #

I am a registered Democrat, conservative in my views and independent in my thinking. (My husband says I am more Republican than he is). It is too bad that a person needs to have an affiliation with one of the 2 major parties to be recognized in the election process. It is unfortunate in today’s campaigns the candidates have to raise so much money to fight smears and innuendos from the other side.

For me it is simple, I am pro-choice, but for myself I choose life. Jesus died on the cross for all our sins and we have the choice to follow his lead or not. I cannot say what I would do in the case of rape or incest, but I want the option. I do not want the government to tell me what I can do with my body nor do I expect them to foot the bill. That is between my conscience, my God, and me. I do not condemn those who choose otherwise but I do not think they should expect the government to pay their bill.

Tell me what are your plans to end this war. Talk to me about health-care. Why does our employees (Congress) have better insurance coverage that the employer (the taxpayer). Tell me how we have equitable education available for all our citizens. Tell me honestly how much these necessities will cost (shave the waste). Show me you have the capacity to rationally think a problem through. And do not talk to me out of both sides of your mouth. The majority of us are smarter than that.

Comment on this article: