News & Commentary
Obama's Next School Speech Should be to the Adults
In
today's hyper-partisan political climate, it's no surprise that
President Obama's speech to America's school children caused such
controversy. But this is a moment to set aside the usual battles in
Washington.
We should appreciate the president's advice to school children and
his role as a symbol of what anyone can achieve through hard work. He
has more to do, however. Next he needs to address the educational
establishment.
The president made several important observations during his speech,
which families, teachers, and the rest of us should underscore. The
first is that responsibility for education starts with students.
The role of parents and teachers obviously is critical. But nothing,
even "the best schools in the world," Obama told our kids, "will matter
unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities."
Second, the president affirmed the key role of education and
exploration in unlocking each individual's talents. "Every single one
of you has something to offer," he told the kids, "And you have a
responsibility to yourself to discover what that is."
Then there is preparation. Obama told the nation's young: "You want
to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a police officer? ...You're going to
need a good education for every single one of those careers. You can't
drop out of school and just drop into a good job. You've got to work
for it and train for it and learn for it."
Obviously, the president isn't the first person to bring this
message to young people. However, he has a unique credibility that many
of us--parents, teachers, administrators--lack.
Here is the nation's first African-American president, who grew up
in difficult circumstances. Did some of the children listening suffer
through tough times? Of course, and he addressed them directly:
"I get it. I know what that's like. My father left my family when I
was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother who struggled at
times to pay the bills and wasn't always able to give us things the
other kids had."
Nor was he afraid to admit that he'd messed up: "I did some things
I'm not proud of, and got in more trouble than I should have." But he
and his wife, Michelle, had good people in their lives, and took
advantage of the opportunities they found.
Perhaps most important, he told students to forget lame excuses and
self-serving rationalizations. Life's circumstances, he emphasized, are
"no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude." They
aren't a reason to drop out of school. And they most certainly don't
justify "not trying."
Poor children, in particular, may have suffered from racial, ethnic
or religious discrimination, economic hardship, parental failure,
decrepit communities, and abysmal schools. But, emphasized the
president, "Where you are now doesn't have to determine where you'll
end up. No one's written your destiny for you." Obama understands as he
wrote his own destiny.
Poor children, in particular, may have suffered from racial, ethnic
or religious discrimination, economic hardship, parental failure,
decrepit communities, and abysmal schools. But, emphasized the
president, "Where you are now doesn't have to determine where you'll
end up. No one's written your destiny for you." Obama understands as he
wrote his own destiny.
This message of hope and encouragement is one that has to be
repeated again and again. Next Sunday night on MSNBC, the Independent
Women's Forum is hosting an event to discuss exactly these issues: the
real problems that face children growing up in poverty and the
obligation that parents, communities, and all of us have in make sure
that opportunities exist so that all children can thrive.
Of course, not all of the responsibility rests on individual
children, or even individual families. The president avoided politics
in his speech. But we can't avoid politics in thinking about education.
Too often, public schools fail the kids who most need a good
education to overcome difficult life circumstances. High school
graduation rates are down over the last 40 years. Math and reading
scores have stagnated and American students lag behind children in many
countries.
Obama should take his "no excuses" talk to the educational
establishment. Argues Paul E. Peterson of the Hoover Institution: "The
president didn't hesitate to tell American kids to take responsibility
for their behavior. It's time he delivered that same message to states,
school districts and unions."
Obviously, not all public schools are bad, just as not all private
schools are good. But competition forces the latter, which have to
convince parents to pay tuition, to be better. In contrast, public
schools compete politically for bigger appropriations. Too many
institutions are rewarded more for failure than for success.
While there is no simple solution for improving American education,
providing parents with choice is the most important single change that
we could make. Give parents authority, and they will get more involved
in their children's education.
Give parents options, and they will punish poorly performing public
schools by withdrawing their kids. Force all schools, public and
private alike, to compete by improving their educational performance,
and we all will win.
Obama is uniquely positioned to speak out on behalf of minorities
and the poor. His message should be no more excuses ... it is after
all, about our children. If the public schools can't satisfy the needs
of the most disadvantaged in our society, then we must support
alternatives.
"Make us all proud," Obama urged America's school children. To help
them do that, we should create an educational system that makes us all
proud.
Examiner contributor and MSNBC analyst Michelle D. Bernard is the
president and CEO of the Independent Women's Forum and Independent
Women's Voice and will host "About Our Children" on MSNBC on Sunday,
September 20, 2009.
Comment on this article:
- Your comment was posted. Comments are held for approval.




3 Comments
Ann | September 16, 2009, 10:01am | #
So it's ok for us to put aside "the usual battles in Washington" when it's something that YOU think is important, school choice, but screw the tens of millions of people who want healthcare reform? I have to wonder if you're speaking out on school choice because you're getting grilled from your hardcore right-wing base over being ... what was it they called you ... oh yhea - an "Obama shill".
Seriously - WHO are you and WHAT do you stand for?
Jodi Kasten | September 16, 2009, 10:07am | #
Perhaps you could just make a commercial aimed at all the educational professionals in this country telling them that school vouchers will let thousands of teachers die of breast cancer. That seems to be the plan in other arenas. Why not tie it all together?
Debi | September 18, 2009, 8:42am | #
Thank you Michelle for trying to explain how we need to give authority back to the families to make educational decisions for their children. Why can't people see that children were better educated when parents, teachers and schools decided what they'd teach not the government. Vouchers and school choice is one way to get rid of underachieving schools and teachers, which are part of the problem.