Phyllis Schlafly weighs in over a Townhall.com with a good column on the subject. As Phyllis points out, in many ways U.S. athletes won in spite of Title IX, not because of it. Take gymnastics and wrestling for example:
Title IX regulations have forced educational institutions to eliminate men’s teams until the number of men and women on sports teams is the same ratio as the number of men and women enrolled in academic classes. In the numerous colleges that are now 60 percent female in academic enrollment, Title IX requires that men’s teams be eliminated until only 40 percent of the athletes are men.
Title IX quotas have caused the elimination of all but 19 men’s college gymnastics teams. This deprives boys of the scholarship incentive to take up gymnastics as a sport in high school and takes away the competition needed to improve their skills in college.
The effect of this injustice hit us hard in Beijing. The Chinese (who are not restricted by feminist nonsense) destroyed our men’s gymnastics team and won seven out of eight gold medals, while our men’s gymnastics team failed to win a single gold medal in eight events.
Then there is men’s freestyle wrestling, a sport that the United States had repeatedly dominated at the Olympics. Over the years, we had won a very high percentage of medals in wrestling.
But Title IX’s gender quotas have forced the elimination of 467 wrestling teams from our colleges. This has nothing to do with lack of funding, since wrestling is one of the most inexpensive of sports, it’s due to feminist ideology that demands eliminating macho sports in order to meet the foolish Title IX quotas.The devastating outcome in the 2008 Olympics was predictable. America won only one medal…